-
Re: Legalizing a personal "workhorse" font for a specific client
Your description implies that your client wants full ownership of the typeface — a buyout — not simply an exclusive license. But if that’s not true, then perhaps the client could have a period of exc…6 -
Re: A clarification about kerning.
In my opinion, kerning should always be optical -- a judgement by eye -- in the final analysis. Particularly with a humanist design like Garamond, numeric measurements are a good place to start and a…7 -
Re: WOFF2 and Modification Restrictions
It’s fine to discuss licensing issues and the intent of commercial EULA terms. It just wasn’t my point, and I don’t think it was “incorrect” for me to make it in the context of the OP. Really, my ori…2 -
Re: WOFF2 and Modification Restrictions
I think the technicalities are important — what is actually happening, versus how it looks superficially. As I said, WOFF is a wrapper, and the font is treated no differently than if it were in a ZI…2 -
Re: WOFF2 and Modification Restrictions
@RichardW, Coming in late to this thread, but I just ran across it. WOFF is completely reversible — it’s really a transport wrapper that supports some additional metadata, but whatever font that goes…1
