-
Re: WOFF2 and Modification Restrictions
I think the technicalities are important — what is actually happening, versus how it looks superficially. As I said, WOFF is a wrapper, and the font is treated no differently than if it were in a ZI…2 -
Re: WOFF2 and Modification Restrictions
@RichardW, Coming in late to this thread, but I just ran across it. WOFF is completely reversible — it’s really a transport wrapper that supports some additional metadata, but whatever font that goes…1 -
Re: Adobe Creative Cloud - Now Allowing YOUR Fonts to be Added!
Not having a license, or leaving basic license terms unstated, undermines your ownership of your work. It’s a vague, general principle so I don’t want to try to get into specifics (and besides, I am …2 -
Re: Thoughts on Monotype and its subsidiaries?
It’s important to remember that “cloud fonts” largely grew out of web font services (e.g. Typekit ➝ Typekit Desktop ➝ Adobe Fonts), so I think to some extent the cloud solutions for desktop fonts wou…4 -
Re: protecting my design while presenting it to a foundry
In my experience, some do refuse to sign an NDA! It tends to work only when the refusing party has some leverage (i.e. some reason for the other party to care), but I’ve seen it and made effort to a…2
